(på Svenska under)
Technology a blessing or a curse
To those it may concern
During the past year I have the Vicar of Solna parish regularly talked with Magnus Olsson. His information was amazing and scary and not entirely easy to relate to for me that is not scientifically trained, and technically adept.
His information about ICT implants for monitoring of inaccessible parts of the body.
There are great opportunities but also great dangers.
Many ethical issues have been discussed several years ago at the EU level by The European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies under the direction of Professor George Hermerén.
The group’s hope was that these dangers would be discussed in the EU countries.
So, in all cases not in our country, Sweden.
Here are some of the areas highlighted by the group:
- ICT implants can not be removed easily
- ICT implants may influence, evaluate and modify mental function
- ICT implants may be through a network’s capacity is being abused in various ways for all kinds of surveillance and manipulation, such as for children and handicapped persons.
- ICT implants may affect the nervous system and in particular the brain and in the wrong hands lasts a threat to individual autonomy and dignity and autonomy.
Sweden is a world leader in this field and has no laws regarding how technology should be managed and conducted research. This in itself is serious and a threat not only to individuals but can also be a threat to our democracy.
Magnus, the victim of an implant against his will and that the technology for several years has been tested and that this has affected his health and life.
He has found several people with similar experiences. Then I judge Magnus as a credible person and understand that it is technically quite feasible to test so I would
In this way, try to relaunch a public conversation about technology and ethics.
My hope is in the first place that Magnus will be heard and helped, in the alternative that
The debate comes in again and that we have the legislation and regulation on both research and the use of ICT implants in our country and in Europe.
Johan Engvall, vicar of Solna
Teknik till välsignelse eller förbannelse
Till den som det berör
Under det senaste året har jag som kyrkoherde i Solna församling regelbundet samtalat med Magnus Olsson. Hans uppgifter var häpnadsväckande och skrämmande och inte helt lätta att ta till sig för mig som inte är naturvetenskapligt skolad, eller särskilt tekniskt intresserad.
Hans uppgifter handlar om ICT-implantat för övervakning av otillgängliga delar i kroppen.
Här finns fantastiska möjligheter, men också stora faror.
Många etiska aspekter har diskuterats för flera år sedan på EU-nivå av The European group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies under ledning av Professor Göran Hermerén.
Gruppens önskan var att dessa faror skulle diskuteras i EU:s länder.
Så har i alla fall inte skett i vårt land Sverige.
Här följer exempel på områden som uppmärksammades av gruppen:
- ICT-inplantat kan inte avlägsnas lätt
- ICT-inplantat kan influera, utvärdera och förändra psykiska funktioner
- ICT-inplantat kan genom ett nätverks kapacitet missbrukas på flera sätt för alla sorter av övervakning och manipulation, t ex för barn och handikappade personer.
- ICT-inplantat kan påverka nervsystemet och i synnerhet hjärnan och därmed i fel händer varar ett hot mot individens autonomi och värdighet och självbestämmande.
Sverige är världsledande på detta område och saknar lagstiftning kring hur tekniken ska hanteras och forskningen bedrivas. Detta är i sig allvarligt och ett hot inte bara mot enskilda människor utan kan också vara ett hot mot vår demokrati.
Magnus, har blivit utsatt för ett inplantat mot sin vilja och att tekniken under flera år har testats och att detta har påverkat hans hälsa och liv.
Han har hittat flera personer med liknande upplevelser. Då jag bedömer Magnus som en trovärdig person och har förstått att det tekniskt är fullt möjligt att genomföra test så vill jag
På detta sätt försöka få i gång ett offentligt samtal kring tekniken och etiken.
Min förhoppning är i första hand att Magnus ska bli lyssnad på och hjälpt, i andra hand att
Debatten kommer i gång och att vi får en lagstiftning och reglering kring både forskningen och användningen av ICT-inplantat i vårt land och i Europa.
Johan Engvall, kyrkoherde i Solna
Samsung thinks up mind-reading brain implant
Company files patent application for an implantable medical device that can transmit information. Think of it as a secure Wi-Fi router for yor bodey.
Samsung’s brain implant comes with security to fend off zombie surgeons, and hopefully non-zombie hackers, too.
Samsung has applied for a patent on an implantable medical device that can communicate physiological/pathological information with an “external device.”
At last, an app to tell us when we’re stressed, drunk, or asleep (states that typically occur in that order, at least for me).
Samsung envisions much more than just a pacemaker you connect to. The application includes a number of possible scenarios with sci-fi implications such as a brain implant to keep track of brainwaves (but certainly not embed subliminal messages about the superior quality of Samsung devices) and fingertip implants for motion detection.
There’s even mention of using the brain implant to directly control the system. Cutting through the patent-speak, Samsung is talking about an implant system capable of being controlled through thought.
Also fascinating is the apparent acknowledgment of the scary Orwell-meets-The Matrix potential of such a technology with the inclusion of a security engine in the device that could send alerts to the user whenever someone else is attempting to access the system.
So that scary pre-singularity moment could appear sooner than we thought: the day we have to decide if a chip in the head that could tell us about the stroke we’re about to have is worth the risk of a becoming the target of a brain hack. Suddenly, regular doctor’s check-ups aren’t sounding so bad anymore.
Hacking The Brain !
The world is changing fast–maybe faster than we ever thought. And within five years, science fiction is going to turn into non-fiction. We’ll be able to read each other’s minds, forget all our passwords.
IBM 2012 5 IN 5
To understand the issue a little clearer, we will need to treat the human brain much like a computer with dedicated hardware. In this respect, what we are looking for is one, or more, security flaws that we can exploit. So, we have to come at this much like a hacker would.
We know from our previous articles that the brain emits weak radio frequencies in the sub-1000Hz range. The principles of radio tell us anything that can produce a radio signal, can also accept one. Thus, we have overcome our first major hurdle, the establishment of a physical transport layer. A physical transport layer allows for two-way communications.
Instant readers of th world
Given that we know that no information is directly encoded onto the radio waves, the frequencies are unique due to axon properties and the supply of energy will cause a neuron to fire, we have now established a data transport layer. That is, data is not communicated, it is stimulated in the target and the target experiences whatever that stimulation corresponds to.
If we return to our hacker analogy, what we have found is the human brain, whilst using a spread spectrum and a highly discreet frequency response to eliminate cross-talk, is unable to label information and determine that it has been processed before. In short, the human brain is vulnerable to what is known as a replay attack.
For those that have a deeper interest, or indeed are involved in Neuroscience, I have come across a scientific paper which should outline the principle in more scientific terms. The following paper, published in 1995, describes the electromagnetic induction of “fundamental algorithms”, or neural networks, to generate any sensory perception required. We will get to how this functions in a moment, for now, have a quick read:
On the possibility of directly accessing every human brain by electromagnetic induction of fundamental algorithms.
Behavioural Neuroscience Laboratory, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Contemporary neuroscience suggests the existence of fundamental algorithms by which all sensory transduction is translated into an intrinsic, brain-specific code. Direct stimulation of these codes within the human temporal or limbic cortices by applied electromagnetic patterns may require energy levels which are within the range of both geomagnetic activity and contemporary communication networks. A process which is coupled to the narrow band of brain temperature could allow all normal human brains to be affected by a subharmonic whose frequency range at about 10 Hz would only vary by 0.1 Hz.
I have provided two diagrams, on the right hand side, to explain how this functions. If we look at diagram two, we can observe how the neurons, when viewing green grass, emits a specific pattern of radio waves at certain frequencies. If we now look at diagram three, we can observe that transmitting this pattern and frequencies back to the brain will result in the target seeing green grass. Of course, there are certain limitations and we will discuss them in a moment.
As we can see, anything we can possibly experience can be reduced to certain patterns and frequencies emitted from the human brain. As such, any experience can be faked by a computer and sent to your brain. Thus, it is a matter of recognizing these patterns and frequencies and this brings us back to the first citation in this article.
As human beings, we all assume that we are unique and that should be the case with our brains. As much as we would wish this to be true, it is simply not. We all must perform the same functions and be wired relatively similarly to conduct those functions. The reason we can all, for the most part, see, touch, smell, hear and taste indicates that we have all have the same basic circuitry that allows these perceptions to function. With pattern matching and a large database we can build a library of thoughts, feelings, images, opinions and sounds that are generally applicable to anyone.
Thus, as the above citation calls it, we all have certain fundamental algorithms. As such, we all emit very similar patterns and frequencies due to this similar wiring. The slight variations that do occur, prevent us from emitting radio waves that would cause interference in all of our perceptions. If this we’re not the case, we would experience each others thoughts, vision, auditory and emotional experiences every minute of every day. Again, for our astute readers, this would indicate limited acts of natural telepathy due to wave propagation and frequency response. That, however, is a completely different story.
The limitation that I mentioned earlier are the result of actively processing input. That is, whilst I can put phosphenes or bright images in your vision, I may not be able to put more subtle or complex images. The problem is that the neurons are already firing and I have only two choices, interrupt or accelerate. That would usually translate to either darkness, or a bright spot. A similar issue exists with all sensory input. As a result, it is not possible to place someone into a VR type environment, but it is possible to scramble their inputs, causing wide spread malfunctions, hallucinations and loss of motor skills.
The Dark Side
That’s pretty much it for the technical side of the mechanism, but the real question would be, what would it be like? Well, if I got you to think of the phrase “Hello World!” and recorded the associated frequencies and patterns, I could retransmit them and you would feel that you have just thought the words “Hello World!”, in your own inner voice. Unless you had extensive experience with the A.I. and a very deep understanding of your own mind, then it would be impossible to tell the difference.
Now, imagine a merger talks, or even political agreement. To get a person to commit to an agreement, I simply transmit a copy of my own feelings of acceptance to the target. They now feel the way you do about the agreement and will sign. It is also possible to block certain thoughts, or feelings of negativity, and even place your own counter-arguments to these thoughts directly into their mind. As far as the target is concerned, it was their own idea and they did it out of their own free will.
Why debate when you can impose your will?
Sat Oct 9, 2010 2:48 PM EDT
Although the offered explanations for “Hearing Voices” can include everything from trickery to hidden transmitters to tinnitus to psychic/haunting experiences to possession or encounters with God/aliens (to so – called schizophrenic episodes) by far the most common REAL reason is covert Neurophone harassment as arranged by government agencies and/or other criminals.
US Patent # 3,393,279. July 16th, 1968
US Patent # 3,647,970. March 7th, 1972
The Neurophone was developed by Dr Patrick Flanagan in 1958. It’s a device that converts sound to electrical impulses. In its original form electrodes were placed on the skin but with defence department developments, the signals can be delivered via satellite. They then travel the nervous system directly to the brain (bypassing normal hearing mechanisms). Dr Flanagan’s “3D holographic sound system” can place sounds in any location as perceived by the targeted / tortured listener. This allows for a variety of deceptions for gullible victims.
Today, the CIA, DIA (etc) use satellites and ground – based equipment to deliver verbal threats, deafening noise and propaganda; using neurophone technology. Anything from TV’s/radio’s appearing to operate when switched off through to “Voices from God” and encounters with “telepathic” aliens are all cons using neurophone technologies to torment, deceive and (most importantly) discredit agency/criminal targets. Naturally, the system can mimic anyone’s voice and automatic computer translations (into any language) are incorporated.
Anecdotal evidence indicates that people like David Koresh, Martin Bryant and others could have been programmed then remotely triggered (or tricked) using harrassment technologies like the neurophone. (Although most of the targets are intelligent and law-abiding). For example, John Lennon’s killer, Mark Chapman, (Sweden) Anna Lind, Olof Palme, reportedly heard voices before and after silencing the agency-hounded peace advocate. “God” apparently told him to confess verbally.
To explain why others physically moving into the path of the laser do not pick up the signals, please note the following “possibilities”… a) Kirlean photography may be an ancillary system so it’s attuned to the targets personal energy field (their unique EM waves).
b) The magnetite in our brains can act as a detectable fingerprint.
c)Equally each of us has a unique bioelectrical resonance frequency in our brains. EMF Brain stimulation may be encoded so that pulsating EM signals sent to the targets brain cause audio-visual effects which only the target experiences. This, to me, is the best explanation.
d) The individuals “vibrational pattern” could be used as a signal filter like a radio receiving only the sound modulating the frequency of the station it’s tuned to.
e) The monitors simply adjust the volume downwards when you’re in a position where the signal could hit someone else’s body. Even if they heard it (briefly) they’d attribute it to another voice in the crowd etc.
As with the final proof, the definitive answer lies in the actual blueprints; secreted in the bowels of the Pentagon or some similar facility. Nonetheless, there is no report of ANY intercepted neurophone signals. If it wasn’t so effective it would not have been used to facilitate silent communications between U.S. government agents/Europ/military personnel.
Highlight of the Mindjustice.org website:
The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Op-Eds:
Outlaw nonconsensual human experiments now by Cheryl Welsh, published online June 2009 athttp://www.thebulletin.org/
New article “Bioethics Commission Failed Obama’s Mandate in New Report” by Cheryl Welsh in The Daily Censored, an online news source in cooperation with Sonoma State University’s student-run Project Censored. See: http://dailycensored.com/2012/01/05/bioethics-commission-failed-obamas-mandate-in-new-report/
President Obama will act on the Presidential Bioethics Commission December 2011 report. Now is a unique time for public input. Human subject protections should include a U.S. rule or statute that requires informed consent in classified research.
Table of Contents
- Citations of Mind Justice
- Russian Research
- Experimentation Law
- Selected Projects by Mind Justice
- Research and Information
- Allegations by Targeted Individuals from Around the World
- Future Plans for Mind Justice
This is an extensive list of informational website relating to the crimes of organised, directed energy weapons, pyscho-electronic mind control, and related topics.
Posted 4 years, 7 months ago. Add a comment